Organising an effective R&D strategy, according to BCG

Innovation Infographic (BCG)

Critical Finding: Maximum Priority, Minimum Readiness

While innovation has never been a higher priority, the **maturity (or "readiness")** of innovation systems has collapsed. Post-pandemic uncertainty pushed leaders to focus on short-term agility, weakening strategic alignment.

83%
of companies rank innovation among their **TOP 3 PRIORITIES** (Historical record)
3%
of companies are in the **READY ZONE** ("Ready Zone" - i2i Score ≥ 80). A 17-point drop since 2022.

The "Zombie" Risk

Without a clear strategy, innovation becomes a **"zombie"** organization: activities continue at pre-pandemic levels, but without clear strategic direction, they fail to create value.

-5%

**Fewer sales** from new products for companies adopting **NONE** of the 6 best strategic practices.

The Critical Gap: Problems Are Strategic, Solutions Are Operational

Top 3 Challenges Cited by Executives

Unclear or overly broad strategy
52%
Rising cost of capital
47%
Talent pool constraints
44%

Planned Actions for the Next Year

Companies are focusing on efficiency rather than strategic overhaul.

Update innovation operating model
70%
Expand innovation portfolio
63%
Refresh innovation strategy
30%

The Roadmap: Strategic Alignment and the Power of Generative AI

1. Start with Strategy (Nvidia Example)

Organizations with a **strong link** between business and innovation strategy are **DRAMATICALLY MORE EFFECTIVE**.

**CONCRETE CASE:** Nvidia, focused on accelerated computing, pivoted to AI chips after 2012, investing heavily in what was then a "zero-billion-dollar market," now making it the 3rd most valuable company globally.

The 6 Best Practices for Linking Strategy and Innovation

  • Senior executive ownership (CEO)
  • Clear sense of purpose for innovation
  • Focus on competitive advantage
  • Specified domains
  • Target portfolio structure (Least adopted)
  • Quantified objectives (Least adopted)

share of sales from new products for companies adopting **4 OR MORE EFFECTIVE PRACTICES**.

2. Accelerate Innovation with Generative AI (GenAI)

86% of companies are experimenting with GenAI. "Ready" innovators are **5 times more likely** to apply GenAI at scale. GenAI complements predictive AI by boosting creativity, ideation, and content production.

The 3 Pillars of GenAI Application (Objectives)

🚀 DEPLOY (Productivity)

**Objective:** Focus on "quick wins" with off-the-shelf tools to boost individual productivity and build initial experience at scale.

🛠️ RESHAPE (Efficiency)

**Objective:** Rethink critical internal functions (R&D, manufacturing) via GenAI to improve quality, speed, and efficiency, and free up resources for higher-value activities.

💡 INVENT (Growth)

**Objective:** Create new GenAI-enabled products, services, and business models to drive growth and sustainable competitive advantage (the highest potential return).

Concrete Examples by Pillar

DEPLOY (Examples)

  • Use of "off-the-shelf" GenAI tools.
  • **Automated meeting summaries** (e.g., Zoom).
  • **Drafting of report outlines** (time savings).

RESHAPE (Examples)

  • Sanofi: **40% reduction in clinical trial report creation time**.
  • Mattel: **Quadrupling** the number of Hot Wheels concept images generated (ideation).
  • Use of a virtual **"Devil's Advocate"** to challenge ideas.

INVENT (Examples)

  • Microsoft **Copilot** for M365 (hyper-personalization assistant).
  • L'Oréal **Beauty Genius** (personalized beauty advice via app).
  • E-commerce optimization: **rapid creation of text and images** for product pages.

Impact on the CREATE Phase (Summary)

GenAI is a powerful aid in the **divergence** and **prototyping** phase. It allows for the rapid generation of a universe of options, images, UX designs, and 3D models. It can also act as a virtual **"Devil's Advocate"** to strengthen ideas by iteratively challenging them, ensuring rigor.

The AI Race: Disruption Risk vs. Adoption Rate (Exhibit 9)

This chart crosses companies' concern about GenAI disruption (Y-axis) with their current adoption score (X-axis). Industries are classified based on their position in these 4 quadrants: